Search for: "Taylor v. Commissioner" Results 1 - 20 of 350
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2018, 2:09 am by CMS
Jim Hillan and Rachel Arnison, who both work in the tax team at CMS, comment on the judgment handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the Scottish appeal of Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc, [2018] UKSC 35: Further to our previous blog on this case, the Supreme Court has overturned the judgment of the Inner House of the Court of Session. [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:03 am by CMS
Jim Hillan and Rachel Arnison, who both work in the tax team at CMS, comment on the Scottish appeal of Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc, on which judgment is currently awaited from the UK Supreme Court: Background Can a member of a VAT group other than the representative member make a claim on behalf of that VAT group? [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 9:06 am
Today's advance release habeas law opinions: Taylor v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 2:12 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Claims made by Carlton were not properly regarded as claims made by Taylor Clark as representative of the VAT Group. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The decision in Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing LLP ([2017] EWCA Civ 74) reverses a decision by the High Court that the law firm Taylor Wessing had not breached the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA) by refusing to carry out searches on grounds of proportionality, legal privilege and improper purpose. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am by David Smith
The post Spencer v Taylor- Some Analysis appeared first on Nearly Legal. [read post]
25 May 2018, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland) was heard on 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Declaratory Judgment Opinions Body: AC33283 - Taylor v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In this appeal to the Commissioner of Education, the petitioner [Petitioner] contended that certain actions taken by school district administrators [District] and the president of employee organization [Association] of a recognized or certified employee organization  for the purposes of collective bargaining under Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the Taylor Law, were contrary to the terms of the relevant collective bargaining agreement [CBA] between the Association and the… [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:46 pm
Similarly, in Port Washington Union Free School Dist. v Port Washington Teachers Assn., 268 AD2d 523, the Appellate Division ruled that a CBA provision that allowed a teacher to be absent with pay on "any of the religious holidays designated by the New York State Commissioner of Education" without charging his or her absence to leave credits violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:51 am by Public Employment Law Press
"A decision of the Commissioner of Education involving "student discipline" in which the Commissioner considered a plea of “no contest” is Decisions of the Commissioner 16,385, posted on the Internet at http://www.counsel.nysed.gov/Decisions/volume52/d16385.html. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:51 am by Public Employment Law Press
"A decision of the Commissioner of Education involving "student discipline" in which the Commissioner considered a plea of “no contest” is Decisions of the Commissioner 16,385, posted on the Internet at http://www.counsel.nysed.gov/Decisions/volume52/d16385.html. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:17 am by Scott Michelman
And at the Supreme Court, it’s the rationale for a steady string of summary reversals, including yesterday’s decision in Taylor v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 3:23 pm
Smith & Wesson is celebrating the occasion with the Heller v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 12:10 pm
Misuse of an agency's computersBedford v Raymond W. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A school employee who elected to submit an issue for resolution through a contractual grievance procedure may not appeal the same issue pursuant to Education Law §310Decisions of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,235In this appeal to the Commissioner of Education, the petitioner [Petitioner] contended that certain actions taken by school district administrators [District] and the president of employee organization [Association] of a recognized or certified… [read post]