Search for: "Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 21 - 40
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm
A senior barrister who failed to keep clients’ sensitive personal information secure has been fined £1,000 by the Information Commissioner’s Office. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 4:06 pm
Socially Aware’s February newsletter is now available. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
Ireland’s data protection commissioner has launched an inquiry into the processing of personal data of users of the Tinder dating app. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Atlantic Council’s DFRLab, #StopTheSteal: Timeline of Social Media and Extremist Activities Leading to 1/6 Insurrection, Just Security (Feb. 10, 2021) 2. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 28 February 2022, the claimant’s case was dismissed in Taylor v Nationwide News Pty Limited (No 2) [2022] FCA 149. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Taylor v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
The Privacy and Information Security Law Blog has more information here. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Comm Social Security Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 08a0426p.06 Ronald Madden v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
On Thursday 14 March 2024 there was a contempt application in the case of Taylor v Chief Constable of Kent, QB-2022-000310. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Washington-Carty v Fisher, heard 14 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) Mark Lewis Law v Taylor Hampton, heard 25-27 and 30-31 October 2017 (Moulder J). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
The hearings, "Protection from Persecution: Establishing Humanitarian Pathways for Hong Kongers and Uyghurs" is intended to be a "catalyst for passage of legislation offered in the 117th Congress to extend protections for Hong Kongers and Uyghurs facing a well-founded fear of persecution, including legislation offered by CECC Commissioners. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
On the same day there was a hearing in the case of Taylor v Crouch and another before Nicklin J. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
Data Protection The Privacy and Data Security Law blog has an update on a recent speech given by Information Commissioner Christopher Graham. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-5155 September 8, 2011 Judge: Briscoe Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Petitioner Becky Jean Willig appealed an opinion and order entered by a United States Magistrate Judge that affirmed the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) denying her application for supplemental security income benefits. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
(Securing Innovation) Why blog about intellectual property? [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:49 am
Case Study: The SEC v. [read post]
