Search for: "Taylor v. Department of Air Force"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2019, 1:17 pm
Air Force leadership has ordered a review of how it chooses accommodations for overnight flights after reports that aircrews had occasionally stayed at President Trump’s resort in Scotland during refueling stops, according to Politico. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 8:42 am
In November 2020, the court granted, reversed, and remanded a qualified immunity decision out of the Fifth Circuit in Taylor v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:43 am
DMNA is a division of the Executive Department, a public employer2. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 2:50 pm
This task-force also calls for the development of new technologies to measure ambient exposure and understanding of fate and behavior of nanoparticles in air. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:55 am
John Bellinger shared the recommendations of the Stimson Center Task Force on U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
The Feres doctrine, stemming from the 1950 Feres v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Webb v EMO Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (No 2) (1994) Debra Morris67. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 3:23 am
Circuit case, Taylor v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:53 pm
” In Taylor v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
Mr Justice Mann ruled that the claim relating to allegations about what the legal department knew could be aired at a trial. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:27 am
” See Air Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 3:18 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Circuit ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
That case, Texas v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Click Here Court orders will force homeowners in nine East Bay cities to fix or replace sewer lines at sale, upgrade. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
" Accordingly, the Appellate Division opined that Atkinson's supervisor "was without authority to receive delivery of Atkinson resignation letter" on behalf of the Department's appointing authority. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
" Accordingly, the Appellate Division opined that Atkinson's supervisor "was without authority to receive delivery of Atkinson resignation letter" on behalf of the Department's appointing authority. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Accordingly, the Appellate Division opined that Atkinson's supervisor "was without authority to receive delivery of Atkinson resignation letter" on behalf of the Department's appointing authority. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Accordingly, the Appellate Division opined that Atkinson's supervisor "was without authority to receive delivery of Atkinson resignation letter" on behalf of the Department's appointing authority. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Accordingly, the Appellate Division opined that Atkinson's supervisor "was without authority to receive delivery of Atkinson resignation letter" on behalf of the Department's appointing authority. [read post]
