Search for: "Taylor v. Department of Air Force"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am
” Sufian Taha and Adam Taylor report for the Washington Post. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:43 am
Taylor, 238 N.C. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
" Accordingly, the Appellate Division opined that Atkinson's supervisor "was without authority to receive delivery of Atkinson resignation letter" on behalf of the Department's appointing authority. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
" Accordingly, the Appellate Division opined that Atkinson's supervisor "was without authority to receive delivery of Atkinson resignation letter" on behalf of the Department's appointing authority. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:31 pm
Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Sen. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:22 am
The Russian defense ministry has claimed it killed 500 Ukrainian soldiers overnight after its air force hit 87 military targets in Ukraine. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Circuit ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm
Plachta discussed the ECHR’s decision on German responsibility for an air strike in Afghanistan. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm
Plachta discussed the ECHR’s decision on German responsibility for an air strike in Afghanistan. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
That case, Texas v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Accordingly, the Appellate Division opined that Atkinson's supervisor "was without authority to receive delivery of Atkinson resignation letter" on behalf of the Department's appointing authority. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Accordingly, the Appellate Division opined that Atkinson's supervisor "was without authority to receive delivery of Atkinson resignation letter" on behalf of the Department's appointing authority. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Accordingly, the Appellate Division opined that Atkinson's supervisor "was without authority to receive delivery of Atkinson resignation letter" on behalf of the Department's appointing authority. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Accordingly, the Appellate Division opined that Atkinson's supervisor "was without authority to receive delivery of Atkinson resignation letter" on behalf of the Department's appointing authority. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
The Feres doctrine, stemming from the 1950 Feres v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 8:42 am
In November 2020, the court granted, reversed, and remanded a qualified immunity decision out of the Fifth Circuit in Taylor v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 10:11 am
” Thurston v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
Mr Justice Mann ruled that the claim relating to allegations about what the legal department knew could be aired at a trial. [read post]
