Search for: "Taylor v. E. Connection Operating, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2018, 12:00 am
In Perez v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Taylor serves as a board member of Oil States International, Inc. and Tidewater Inc. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
E.g., Nathan Kimmel, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
’ Coolidge v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
Code § 16.035(b), (e). [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
Goldsmith and E. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
“[W]e should do so only upon the most cogent of reasons being presented. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Margules, Esquire, BOUCHARD MARGULES & FRIEDLANDER, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware, Attorneys for Defendants SIG Growth Equity Management, LLC, SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP, Amir Goldman, Jonathan Klahr, Donors Capital Fund, Inc., Kids Connect Charitable Fund, Daniel Kleinberg, and Tomer Herzog.David S. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
”This element – seniority – cannot be diminished or impaired by the terms of collective bargaining agreement as demonstrated by City of Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045.In Plattsburgh the issue concerned the application of a Taylor Law contract provision dealing with seniority in a layoff situation.The collective bargaining agreement between Plattsburgh and the Union provided if there were to be demotions in connection with a layoff, the "date… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
”This element – seniority – cannot be diminished or impaired by the terms of collective bargaining agreement as demonstrated by City of Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045.In Plattsburgh the issue concerned the application of a Taylor Law contract provision dealing with seniority in a layoff situation.The collective bargaining agreement between Plattsburgh and the Union provided if there were to be demotions in connection with a layoff, the "date… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
”This element – seniority – cannot be diminished or impaired by the terms of collective bargaining agreement as demonstrated by City of Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045.In Plattsburgh the issue concerned the application of a Taylor Law contract provision dealing with seniority in a layoff situation.The collective bargaining agreement between Plattsburgh and the Union provided if there were to be demotions in connection with a layoff, the "date… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
”This element – seniority – cannot be diminished or impaired by the terms of collective bargaining agreement as demonstrated by City of Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045.In Plattsburgh the issue concerned the application of a Taylor Law contract provision dealing with seniority in a layoff situation.The collective bargaining agreement between Plattsburgh and the Union provided if there were to be demotions in connection with a layoff, the "date… [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
Shiley, Inc., 732 F. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has reached an agreement with Sunoco Inc. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
: 09-076/09-090/09-091 Superior Fine Papers Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:44 pm
The defendants Foot Works and Foot Works Inc. are a proprietorship and corporation owned and operated by Stephen Hartman. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]
