Search for: "Taylor v. McDonald"
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
"Pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established, involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law would bar the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation" (Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 331), and "PERB is authorized to determine disputes as to improper employment practices, and to take… [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
"Pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established, involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law would bar the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation" (Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 331), and "PERB is authorized to determine disputes as to improper employment practices, and to take… [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:34 pm
Defendant's counsel on appeal were Matthew Taylor, David Gladden and Jamie Heard. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
"Pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established, involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law would bar the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation" (Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 331), and "PERB is authorized to determine disputes as to improper employment practices, and to take… [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
"Pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established, involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law would bar the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation" (Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 331), and "PERB is authorized to determine disputes as to improper employment practices, and to take… [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 10:11 am
See Keller, 496 U.S. at 17; see also McDonald v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:58 am
” “Generally, where a breach of contract claim arises out of the same facts and seeks the same or similar damages as a legal malpractice claim, the contract claim must be dismissed (see Courtney v McDonald, 176 AD3d 645, 645-646 [1st Dept 2019]; Roth v Ostrer, 161 AD3d 433, 435 [1st Dept 2018]). [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 10:02 pm
Robin McDonald reports that “[e]ight veteran prosecutors” have filed an amicus brief in support of the death-row inmate in Foster v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
But then came Spencer v Taylor (2013) EWCA Civ 1600. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
But then came Spencer v Taylor (2013) EWCA Civ 1600. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
.** In McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, Ct. of Appeals, 92 N.Y.2d 326, the Court of Appeals ruled that in the absence of a Taylor Law contract providing otherwise, a municipality’s past practice does not demonstrate any right to compel the municipality to continue providing the same level of health benefits to its retirees as it has in the past.The decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:39 pm
He also testified that it appeared the files were downloaded through unprotected networks, including an unprotected network at a McDonald's near the Masonite plant. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am
Awaiting the Court’s opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:15 pm
McDonald v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:25 pm
McDonald v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Cir. 13, 16 (Greensville Jun. 27, 2005); McDonald v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 4:04 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 17 November 2015, in the case of Trkulja v Google ([2015] VSC 635) McDonald J dismissed an application by Google to set aside the service out of the jurisdiction, concluding that The submissions advanced on behalf of Google fall well short of establishing that Mr Trkulja has no real prospect of establishing at trial that Google is a publisher and/or that any of the material about which he complains is defamatory. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 11:42 am
In McDonald v Asset Acceptance it was held that a third party debt buyer (Asset Acceptance and Cavalry are very similar in this respect) may not charge interest for the period of time post charge off. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am
This partial incorporation is inconsistent both with prior Supreme Court practice and with McDonald v. [read post]
