Search for: "Taylor v. Parks" Results 21 - 40 of 313
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2022, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
That case led to some further proceedings and eventually to a new opinion, Taylor v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:03 pm by NARF
(Tribal Law; Family Protection Orders) In the Matter of the Estate of Laddie Taylor (Probate) U.S. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has an article summarising and commenting on the 30 March 2022 judgment of Chief Constable of Kent Police & Anor v Taylor [2022] EWHC 737 (QB), in which Saini J allowed a claim for breach of confidence arising from the Defendant’s refusal to delete videos that a law firm that had accidentally disclosed to him and which contained sensitive information about a vulnerable minor. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 6:39 pm by Uthman Law Office
Based on: San Francisco Chronicle, “A woman is suing S.F. for $50 million over a parking ticket, saying tire chalk is unconstitutional,” Rachel Swan, Sep. 11, 2021 https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/A-woman-is-suing-S-F-for-50-million-over-a-16450146.php ALISON PATRICIA TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 2:57 pm by Unknown
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2020-2021update.html A petition for certiorari was denied in one case on 6/1/21, and its rehearing was denied on 8/23/21:Oxendine-Taylor v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]