Search for: "Taylor v. Parks"
Results 141 - 160
of 313
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2021, 5:47 am
(Harris v Seward Park Hous. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:01 pm
Patel v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
Edmonton Northlands, 2019 ABCA 229 the Alberta Court of Appeal held that a libel claim by 19 parking cashiers dismissed in October 2015 can proceed. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 9:59 am
Judges Hazouri and Taylor (and a third judge) sat on the panel. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 9:59 am
Judges Hazouri and Taylor (and a third judge) sat on the panel. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 8:54 pm
Parks, 494 U.S. 484, 488 (1990) (quoting Butler v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:20 pm
Parks, 494 U.S. 484, 488 (1990) (quoting Butler v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 8:00 am
Wiser v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia The decision in the defamation case brought by former political staffer, Bruce Lehrmann, against Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson was due to be handed down this week, however the ruling has been delayed due to fresh evidence being given by former Channel Seven producer Taylor Auerbach. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 6:59 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Lior Strahilevitz looks at NASA v. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
(See Affidavit of Taylor Cratsley, dated November 21, 2016). [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 10:30 am
., Brooklyn Kevin McBride Nostrand/Sheepshead Houses, 3044 Avenue V, 4th fl., Brooklyn Michael McNeil a/k/a Ivan McNeil Van Dyke Houses, 429 Dumont Ave., 3rd fl., Brooklyn Jesus Miranda Cypress Hills Houses, 305 Fountain Ave., 3rd fl., Brooklyn Jamaine Mitchell Adams Houses, 68 Tinton Ave., 1st fl., Bronx Don Mottley Langston Hughes Houses, 301 Sutter Ave., 4th fl., Brooklyn Digna Pujols Riis Houses, 765 FDR Dr., 8th fl., Manhattan … [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:42 am
Six Flags Theme Parks Inc., 64 Cal. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
The Court disagreed, citing SCOTUS’s Wyeth v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:00 pm
V; see also Maryland v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:00 pm
V; see also Maryland v. [read post]
