Search for: "Taylor v. Powell"
Results 41 - 60
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
XXKF4757.B352 2004 D'Angelo Law Library Branch, Taylor. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:57 pm
Smith, author of Hopwood v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 10:29 am
"I know they are permissible under the Supreme Court’s 1990 ruling in the Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:59 am
The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in prohibiting the mother from telling the child that any man other than the father is the child's biological father (citing Matter of Powell v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 am
Supreme Court London Borough of Hounslow v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 (23 February 2011) Forsyth, R v [2011] UKSC 9 (23 February 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Daley- Murdock, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 161 (23 February 2011) Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Delta Air Lines Inc [2011] EWCA Civ 162 (23 February 2011) Berezovsky v Abramovich [2011] EWCA Civ 153 (23 February 2011) 007… [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:56 pm
CLAIRE POWELL v KATIE PRICE 19/3/2010 38. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Rasul v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:15 pm
You can see previous posts on this subject here, here and here.So far, in one citeable case, Taylor v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:09 am
Stuart Taylor Jr., a self-described "conflicted moderate with (for example) a center-left sympathy for gay rights and a center-right discomfort with large racial and gender preferences" contends, apropos of Justice Stewart's pending departure, that "Like some other Republican-appointed justices in recent decades -- Harry Blackmun and Sandra Day O'Connor and, to a lesser extent, David Souter, Warren Burger and Lewis Powell -- Stevens has become markedly… [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm
Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979) Taylor v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
29 May 2009, 4:55 pm
., in Jacksonville, Florida, was on the winning side of Taylor v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, April 15, 2009 Powell v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Per Al-Amin v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:53 am
., Taylor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
• Powell v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Taylor, 917 F.2d at 1403; United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:53 pm
Taylor, 2007 U.S. [read post]
