Search for: "Taylor v. Schneider"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2012, 2:49 pm
Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 512-13 (1947). [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 3:03 am
Contrary to Drexel’s contention, the plaintiff’s claim that Drexel overbilled and charged him for unnecessary legal services is distinct from a legal malpractice cause of action, as the plaintiff’s claim does not challenge the quality of Drexel’s work (see Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d at 416; Tanenbaum v Molinoff, 118 AD3d 774, 775-776). [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 5:15 am
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the most recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:22 am
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [1st Dept 2016]; Cascardo v Dratel, 171 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2019]; see CPLR 3211[a][1], [7]). [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:55 am
Taylor, supra. [read post]
18 May 2007, 9:22 am
Controversy Music v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:30 am
This claim is not duplicative of the legal malpractice claim, as plaintiff’s complaints regarding the over billing were not a direct challenge to the quality of the work but instead a claim that the fee paid bore no rational relationship to the work performed (see Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Johnson, 129 AD3d at 70). [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:58 am
That said, a breach of contract claim premised upon the assertion that the “defendants overbilled … and performed unnecessary services … is not duplicative of the legal malpractice claim” (Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:54 am
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [1st Dept 2016]; Cascardo v Dratel, 171 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2019]; see CPLR 3211 [a] [1], [7]). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:45 am
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Soni v Pryor, 102 AD3d 856, 858 [2d Dept 2013]). [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 6:39 am
” Margaret Taylor sat down with Scott R. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Wade shook the 2022 election” by Elena Schneider and Holly Otterbein (Politico) for Yahoo News North Carolina: “N.C. [read post]
2 May 2020, 8:39 am
House of Representatives v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 8:02 am
Circuit ruling in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 3:10 am
Allegations Allegations of overbilling, padding of costs, and billing for unnecessary legal services can constitute a cause of action for breach of contract, provided the allegations do not directly challenge the quality of the attorney’s work (Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415,416 [1st Dept 2014]; O’Connor v Blodnick, Abramowitz and Blodnick, 295 AD2d 586,587 [2d Dept 2002] [same]). [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:53 am
Taylor, Allstate Staff Counsel;Carmen M. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 2:02 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am
Margaret Taylor summarized the week’s clashes. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 2:16 pm
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm
Adam Chan described the Supreme Court’s ruling in Torres v. [read post]
