Search for: "Taylor v. Social Security"
Results 41 - 60
of 251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2012, 2:45 pm
Justice O’Connor’s formulations in Grutter v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:05 am
Taylor, the denial of security of tenure to almspersons is clearly justifiable as a proportionate measure which secures a fair balance between the interests of charities and current and future almspersons. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:21 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:15 pm
If the decedent is retired at the time of her death, such as in this matter, a claim may also be advanced under the Survival Act for the loss of her future Social Security Benefits, less an appropriate personal maintenance expense. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:17 am
Sackett v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
" See Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:43 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 5:18 pm
Taylor to endure intolerable suffering, it impinges on their security of the person.Having found that the prohibition impinges life, liberty and security of the person, the Supreme Court of Canada then looked at whether it did so in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 3:16 pm
Earlier this year, Taylor v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Edited by Lisa Taylor & Cara-Marie O’Hagan. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
Public officers and employees may engage in outside employment, aka “moonlighting,” subject to certain restrictions and limitationsKastoff v NYS Dept. of Social Services, 195 A.D.2d 808"Moonlighting" has been a common practice in both the public and private sectors. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
heard 4 and 5 February 2020 (Etherton MR, David Richards and Coulson LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, heard 29 and 30 January 2020 (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 Nov [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 12:52 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAttorney's Fees42 USC §406(b) Allows for Fees After Remand, Social Security Claimant Awarded Past Benefits Rose v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:12 pm
The tenancy was a secure tenancy from 1985.Mr and Mrs Laval raised 6 children in the property, but after 1981 Mr Lawal spent much of his tie in Nigeria. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
Legislative intent controls in applying personnel rules providing for the liquidation of sick leave accruals upon separation from serviceCounty of Broome v Badger, 2008 NY Slip Op 08230, decided on October 30, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentInitially the Broom County Legislature adopted a personnel rule setting out the payment that would be made to administrative employees [i.e., unrepresented personnel within the meaning of the Taylor Law] for unused sick time as… [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:17 am
I think this week’s ruling in Burdick v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 3:12 am
In Taylor & Lieberman v. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am
Gavin Wilde analyzed the intelligence community’s role in confronting malign foreign influence campaigns on social media platforms. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
From State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
R v Reeves Taylor, heard 24-25 Jun 2019. [read post]
