Search for: "Taylor v. Superior Court" Results 121 - 140 of 340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
I have sometimes written my opposition to unpublished opinions.The Supreme Court's decision earlier this month in Hughes v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm by Ilya Somin
In the recent SCOTUSblog symposium on the upcoming Fisher v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:16 pm
Under the terms of the disciplinary settlement Taylor was subject to termination without any hearing if, in the opinion of his superior, his job performance was adversely affected by his consumption of alcohol. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 11:25 am by Kent Scheidegger
Taylor (Michael Williams), 529 U.S. 420, 437-40 (2000). [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:25 am by Cicely Wilson
Accordingly, the order of the Superior Court was reversed, and the trial court’s orders were reinstated.Read More: PA Supreme Court denies prisoner’s right to expungeCounty of Grant v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm by Bexis
Warner–Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2007), presumed to know more about Michigan law than either the Michigan courts (Taylor v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 12:26 am
Perhaps the leading case illustrating this principle is Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:38 am
An example of this is found in the Appellate Division's ruling in Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929.Under the terms of a disciplinary settlement, Taylor was subject to termination without any hearing if, in the opinion of his superior, his job performance was adversely affected by Taylor's consumption of alcohol. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:08 am
Taylor, a Suffolk County employee, won reinstatement with full retroactive salary and contract benefits after a court found that he was improperly dismissed during his disciplinary probation period.According to the ruling, under the terms and conditions of the probation to which Taylor had agreed, the county could terminate him without any hearing if, in the opinion of his superior, his job performance was adversely affected by his intoxication on the job during… [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
The exclusion of union representatives, said the court, "ensures that the charges will be probed confidentially and professionally by investigators independent of the employee's own agency and superiors. [read post]