Search for: "Taylor v. United States Department of the Army"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2007, 2:50 pm
Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 379-80 (2000) (plurality opinion). [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:46 pm
Trump ordered the State Department and the United States Agency for International Development to freeze the remaining money allocated for foreign aid, the New York Times writes. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Department of Interior, 538 U.S. 803 (2003). [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:37 am
The president would be able to use as a piggy bank for wall construction money already appropriated by Congress for other Defense Department construction projects and Defense Department resources already allocated to Army civil works programs. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am
Alan Rozenshtein flagged a forthcoming article he wrote for the Yale Law Journal Forum arguing that the Supreme Court was wrong to conclude that the government needed a warrant to collect large quantities of cell-phone location data in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:21 am
Taylor Issue: Whether Department of Labor regulations preclude employees from waiving past claims, as opposed to future claims, under the Family Medical Leave Act. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:55 am
Supreme Court decision Taylor v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am
” In so doing, Roosevelt justified his actions “by virtue of the power and authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States[.] [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 14-493, and United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
The lawsuit charges he “is wrongfully retaining Presidential records that are the property of the United States, and which constitute part of the permanent historical record of the prior administration. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Taylor Wessing website has a post by Timothy Pinto, “The rise of the GDPR in media law“. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am
To reach that conclusion, Judge Garaufis analyzed both the text of the statute and whether the relevant conduct occurred within the United States or extraterritorially. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
The Secret Advantages of Judge Taylor's Opinion in ACLU v. [read post]
