Search for: "Teachers Local 59 v. Special School D. 1" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2017, 5:58 am by MBettman
The court held only one plaintiff had standing to sue; it held the others, who based standing on the “negative effects of gambling,” the fact that they were public school teachers, parents, or payers of “special funds,” had not suffered or were not threatened with any direct and concrete injury in a manner or degree different from that suffered by the public in general.) [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[FN5] The end of the pipeline, or "zenith" as plaintiffs describe it, is admission to one of eight New York City specialized high schools based on the results of the Special High School Admissions Test (the SHSAT). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[FN5] The end of the pipeline, or "zenith" as plaintiffs describe it, is admission to one of eight New York City specialized high schools based on the results of the Special High School Admissions Test (the SHSAT). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Deduction for certain expenses of elementary and secondary school teachers (sec. 62(a)(2)(D))27. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am by MBettman
The court held only one plaintiff had standing to sue; it held the others, who based standing on the “negative effects of gambling,” the fact that they were public school teachers, parents, or payers of “special funds,” had not suffered or were not threatened with any direct and concrete injury in a manner or degree different from that suffered by the public in general.) [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,7 the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,7 the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
Inj. and Workers’ Comp. 2d §§ 4.05[2][a]-[c], 27.01[1][c]; Rassp & Herlick, California Workers’ Compensation Law, Ch. 10, § 10.01[4].] ■ Angela Dawson, Applicant v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 7:12 am by Kyle Persaud
Examples of commonly obtained immigrant visas include: Family members of U.S. citizens Family members of lawful permanent residents Some employment-based immigrants Examples of commonly obtained non-immigrant visas include: Diplomats and foreign government officials Students Temporary workers Tourists Athletes, performing artists, and entertainers Professors, scholars, and teachers (exchange visitors) Business visitors The full list of persons who are… [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 7:12 am by Kyle Persaud
Examples of commonly obtained immigrant visas include: Family members of U.S. citizens Family members of lawful permanent residents Some employment-based immigrants Examples of commonly obtained non-immigrant visas include: Diplomats and foreign government officials Students Temporary workers Tourists Athletes, performing artists, and entertainers Professors, scholars, and teachers (exchange visitors) Business visitors The full list of persons who are… [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
The second confirmed HUS case was an attendee of the teachers’ conference, and a third was determined to be secondary transmission from a person infected at the conference. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
Atlanta, GA 30316 Phone: (404) 486-8400 Fax: (404) 486-8500 Web: http://www.ging.org Goodwill Industries of the Chattahoochee Valley, Inc. 1955 Northside Industrial Boulevard Columbus, GA 31904 Phone: (706) 324-4366 Fax: (706) 660-0429 E-mail: gwicol@gwicol.org Goodwill Industries of Middle Georgia, Inc. 688 Walnut Street, Suite 200 Macon, GA 31201 Phone: (478) 746-7647 Fax: (478) 746-7649 Web: http://www.goodwillworks.org Goodwill Industries of the Coastal Empire, Inc. 7220 Sallie Mood Drive… [read post]