Search for: "Teague v. Lane"
Results 101 - 120
of 167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2012, 7:21 pm
The Court applied the federal analysis set forth in Teague v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 5:11 pm
Lane analysis) Yau v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the decision, commenting that the difference between “the nonretroactivity rule of Teague v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:36 am
Under this long-accepted “retroactivity” doctrine (endorsed by the Court in Teague v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Lane (1989) and Griffith v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:20 pm
Under Teague v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 8:54 pm
Under Teague v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:55 pm
The district court concluded that Padilla did not announce a new rule under the framework set forth in Teague v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:06 pm
Murphy, 521 U.S. 320 (1997), and Teague v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:21 am
Kentucky and Teague v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:02 pm
Lane. [read post]
6 May 2011, 6:43 am
From the District of South Carolina comes another decision holding that Padilla is a “new rule” as per Teague v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:08 am
Lane. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:48 am
See Teague v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:50 am
Then I read Teague v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:27 am
Aug. 25, 2010) (holding that Padilla did not create a new rule under Teague and was therefore retroactively applicable); United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:46 am
Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, in 1987 and for collateral review in Teague v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 2:20 pm
Lane. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 6:37 am
Lane. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm
Lochhart, 65 F.3d 676, 685 (8th Cir. 1995) (quoting Teague v. [read post]
