Search for: "Teague v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 263
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2011, 4:55 pm by Viking
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).See United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:56 am by Susan Brenner
Teague merely stated she needed a computer expert to review certain discovery materials concerning her impending trial. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:02 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  That is how it works in habeas retroactivity issues under Teague v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 6:43 am by Albert Wan
From the District of South Carolina comes another decision holding that Padilla is a “new rule” as per Teague v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The pre-AEDPA Teague doctrine would have applied the new rule in this circumstance.The underlying substantive question is what constitutes a "testimonial" statement for the purpose of Crawford v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:01 am by Steve Lombardi
Mitchell vs Illinois State Police/State of Illinois, Case #10 WC 35184. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]