Search for: "Teamsters Local Union No. 455 v. NLRB"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2014, 11:36 am
App., August 28, 2014) (affirming summary judgement on breach of contract and various other claims; as an at-will employee, plaintiff was properly terminated for taking customer's wallet)Teamsters Local Union No. 455 v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:12 pm
Accordingly, the Board dismissed the petition filed by Petitioner Teamsters Local 984. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
S. 989 (1982), approved in NLRB v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
The Board found that under the Supreme Court's decision in Chicago Teachers' Union Local 1 v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 6:53 am
In NLRB v. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
Charge filed by Teamsters Local 270; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (5). [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
Charge filed by Teamsters Local 890; complaint alleged violations of Secti [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 6:58 am
The appeals court agreed with the NLRB that because the employer’s short-lived threat didn’t materially affect negotiations during the lockout, an order requiring the employer to desist from future threats and to post a notice promising its employees that much was a sufficient remedy (Teamsters Local Union No. 455 v NLRB, August 27, 2014, Gorsuch, N). [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
In finding its application of Kravis proper, the Board found that the Respondent could not have relied on the due process standard overruled by Kravis as well settled when it withdrew recognition of the union, because the Supreme Court's earlier decision in NLRB v. [read post]
