Search for: "Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd." Results 21 - 40 of 102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
Remember, it's more important to do the right thing in bankruptcy than to do something in bankruptcy right now! [read post]
Makor Issues and Rights, Ltd., 551 U.S. 308, 314 (2007),] that a court weigh competing inferences to determine whether a complaint gives rise to an inference of scienter that is “cogent and at least as compelling as any opposing inference of nonfraudulent intent. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:06 am
Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd., 551 U.S. 308 (2007) [see blog article here], to allegations of securities fraud arising from options backdating. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd., 551 U.S. 308 (2007) (see blog article here), to hold that securities fraud plaintiffs must plead an inference of scienter that is both “cogent and at least as compelling as any opposing competing inference. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:15 am
Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd., 551 U.S. 308 (2007) [see blog article on Tellabs], that a plaintiffs’ failure to plead motive and opportunity is an insufficient basis on which to dismiss a complaint that otherwise alleges scienter with the particularity required by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:34 pm
Thanks to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and the Supreme Court's 2007 decision in Tellabs Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 5:29 am
  That motive, according to the Second Circuit, was far from cogent or compelling, as required under Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
The other day we - allegedly belatedly - posted about the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memorandum by Jonathan C. [read post]