Search for: "Tennessee v. Garner" Results 21 - 40 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2018, 12:27 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 90043 (SD IL, May 30, 2018), an Illinois federal district court allowed an inmate to move ahead with his claim that he was excluded from 3 Protestant religious services in retaliation for filing a sexual harassment claim against a volunteer pastor at the prison for his anti-LGBT comments.In Garner v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:58 pm by David Kopel
Thus, the need to train officers in the constitutional limitations on the use of deadly force, see Tennessee v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 11:53 am by Steve Vladeck
I’ve already written at some length about the flawed analytical foundations of Justice Kennedy’s opinion for a 4-2 majority in Ziglar v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  If killing the dogs here was reasonable, it would therefore follow that police may, consistent with the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures (which, under Tennessee v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The leading Supreme Court case is Tennessee v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am by John Ehrett
Garner allows a police officer to use deadly force to prevent the suspect‘s escape if based on the totality of the circumstances, the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm to the officer or others and where when feasible some warning has been given; (2) whether Tennessee v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 5:15 am by SHG
So if conduct that merely violates Tennessee v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Garner allows a police officer to use deadly force to prevent the suspect's escape if based on the totality of the circumstances, the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm to the officer or others, and where feasible some warning has been given; (2) whether Tennessee v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Garner allows a police officer to use deadly force to prevent the suspect’s escape if based on the totality of the circumstances, the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm to the officer or others, and where feasible some warning has been given; (2) whether Tennessee v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 6:06 am by SHG
  So George Washington lawprof Jonathan Turley lawsplains: That seems materially different from the objective test established in Tennessee v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:52 am by SHG
Amnesty’s report also charges that the laws on lethal force in 13 states do not even meet the less stringent constitutional standard set by the 1985 US supreme court case Tennessee v Garner. [read post]