Search for: "Tennessee v. Garner" Results 81 - 100 of 101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm by Michael Stevens
For the reasons set forth below, we DENY the motion to certify and AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 09a0023p.06  Garner v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm by Michael Stevens
For the reasons set forth below, we DENY the motion to certify and AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 09a0023p.06  Garner v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 10:50 am
TENNESSEE Rabies Laws Tennessee dog owners have launched an effort requesting the state to consistently enforce the 3 year rabies immunization requirement set forth in Tennessee law Title 68 Chapter 8 tennessee.gov/sos/acts/103/pub/pc0765.pdf . [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 12:50 pm
The most recent Supreme Court decision to address this issue, Quill Corp. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
Specifically, Garner contends that the district courterred in denying his motion for a new trial based on a violation of Brady v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:15 pm
Because we conclude that Garner did not knowingly and intelligently waive his Miranda rights, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and GRANT Garner a conditional writ of habeas corpus. 07a0371p.06 2007/09/11 USA v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 7:45 am
George takes issue with the Court's prior case on the subject, Tennessee v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 3:44 pm
In order to reach that conclusion, the Scott Court distinguished Tennessee v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 9:01 am
They spent a good deal of time exploring whether there was constitutional significance in the difference between the facts in this case and those in the 1985 decision in a prior deadly force case, Tennessee v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 10:27 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the denial, stating that under Tennessee v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 3:05 pm
The case has the potential for clarifying how a major Supreme Court precedent in 1985 on the use of "deadly force" by police in stopping fleeing suspects, Tennessee v. [read post]