Search for: "Termination:
A A
v.
Indiana Department of Child Services"
Results 1 - 20
of 105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2016, 7:21 am
Indiana Department of Child Services. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 12:16 am
County must pay for parent s appointed attorneyNoting a paradigm shift in parental rights termination cases due to House Enrolled Act 1001, one Indiana Court of Appeals judge believed the Department of Child Services instead of the counties should be responsible for the costs of appointed counsel in these types of proceedings.But the majority in In Re The Termination of the Parental Relationship of J.G., a minor child; S.G., mother, and… [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 2:07 pm
Monroe County Department of Child Services is a 20-page opinion in PDF format but worth the time. [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:18 pm
Indiana Department of Child Services and Child Services, No. 49S02-0902-JV-091, the high court April 24 reversed the termination of R.Y.'s parental rights to her son, G.Y., because the majority believed the termination was clearly erroneous based on the evidence.From what I see of the searches bringing people here for information on terminating parental rights, they do not understand the process. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 5:26 am
However, few cases get published by Indiana's appellate courts and after reading The Indiana Lawyer Daily's COA reverses termination of father s rights, I thought this well worth repeating:"In In Re: The Matter of the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of S.F. and J.F., Michael Farley v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 4:16 am
Department of Child Services, No. 02A03-0712-JV-599. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 11:48 am
Marion County Department of Child Services and Child Advocates, Inc. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 10:50 am
Lake County Department of Child Services (NFP) Jewel Food Stores v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 10:56 am
Whether the Marion County Department of Child Services ("MCDCS") failed to provide Father with proper notice of the termination hearing in violation of Indiana Code section 31-35-2-6.5; II. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 9:33 am
Allen County Child Services, a 15-page opinion, Judge Barnes writes:Michael Farley appeals the termination of his parental rights to his children, J.F. and S.F. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:01 am
Tippecanoe County Department of Child Services (NFP) - termination, affirmed. [read post]
16 May 2007, 10:46 am
Marion County Department of Child Services and Child Advocates, Inc. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:22 pm
Indeed, just last week the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled on a case in which Allen Superior Court Judge Charles Pratt denied a request from the Department of Child Services to terminate parental rights. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 8:20 am
The Allen County Department of Child Services then filed a petition in July 2006 to terminate Farley's rights to the two children. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 11:59 am
In late February, Allen Superior Court-Family Division Judge Charles Pratt denied a request by local officials with the Department of Child Services to terminate the parental rights of the parents of a now-9-year-old boy, identified in court documents as J.M. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 10:33 am
Floyd County Department of Child Services (NFP) - termination, affirmed. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:22 am
Marion County Department of Child Services (NFP) - "The DCS established by clear and convincing evidence the requisite elements to support the termination of Father's parental rights to L.V. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Greene County Department of Child Services (NFP) Termination of Parent-Child Relationship of C.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 6:33 pm
Child Services of Vanderburgh County (NFP) - "Appellant-respondent Leasa Wedding appeals the trial court's denial of her motion for continuance and motion for parenting services from appellee-petitioner, Department of Child Services of Vanderburgh County (DCS). [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 12:07 pm
In the Brackeen case, foster and adoptive parents, and the states of Texas, Louisiana, and Indiana filed suit against the United States, United States Department of the Interior and its Secretary, Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and its Director, BIA Principal Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its Secretary seeking a declaration that Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) was unconstitutional. [read post]
