Search for: "Terry v. Gray" Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2010, 9:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
 Following Mr Justice Tugendhat’s recent decision in Gray v UVW ([2010] EWHC 2367 (QB)), he again decided that, despite the parties having agreed a consent order including anonymity, the interests of the public required that the claimant be named. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
The NCPCA Update can be downloaded in full here. by Angela Downes, Meg Garvin, Wanda Lucibello, Alison Wilkinson, Terry Campos, and Hon. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am by INFORRM
Moreover, the distinctions being drawn by the court in Terry between the form of the claim (breach of confidence/misuse of private information) and its perceived substance (defamation) only matter, for the purpose of interim injunctive relief at any rate, because of the discrepancy between the test in Bonnard v Perryman and that applicable in non-defamation, freedom of expression cases (s 12(3) HRA, as interpreted in Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee) Tugendhat J, of course,… [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 11:41 am
  The opening paragraph in the 2nd District’s decision in Leno v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
As the court made clear in Terry v Person Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)), any application for such derogation should be supported by evidence in an application. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 10:58 am by INFORRM
This was covered in our weekly round ups and some specific posts (see for example, Henry Fox’s February 2010 post “Case Law: Gray and Coogan v News Group and Mulcaire, phone hacking disclosure order“). [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:45 pm by Katelynn Catalano
” Judge Terry Doughty, a federal judge for the U.S. [read post]