Search for: "Terry v. Little" Results 1 - 20 of 320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
DeMitchell, Richard Fossey, and Terri A. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Moreover, it is of little consolation in this context that the only information a canine may be capable of conveying to police is the presence of illegal drugs. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 12:42 pm by Tom Smith
District Judge Terry Doughty temporarily blocked numerous federal agencies and the White House from collaborating with social-media companies and third-party groups to censor speech.Discovery in Missouri v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 12:15 am
A little over a year ago, I wrote that California Superior Court Judge Terry Green had found that AB 979 facially violates the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution,  Cal. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:45 am by Orin S. Kerr
  So my reworked materials start with a section on the history and the development of the Fourth Amendment, starting with Entick v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
” (Wolfe v Shawcor Ltd, 2016 ABQB 261) “It seems to me at this point this is somewhat parallel to the Pythonesque description of a particular parrot” (Karl Hermanns v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]