Search for: "Terry v. Unknown"
Results 1 - 20
of 102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2007, 1:37 pm
US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:30 pm
In Terry [2010] EMLR 16, Tugendhat J considered it was inappropriate to seek injunctive relief against an unknown individual alone where a media organisation had an existing interest in the subject-matter: [114]-[118]. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 11:33 pm
” — Justice Tugendhat, Terry v Person Unknown [2010] EWHC 119 (QB). [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 5:28 am
Harris v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
In the recent case of Terry (previously ‘LNS’) v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)) the court addressed the inter-relationship between two principles: the principle that the court may grant an interim injunction to restrain a threatened misuse of private information where the claimant can show that his claim is (at least) more likely than not to succeed, and the rule in Bonnard v Perryman ([1891] 2 Ch 269 (CA)) whereby the court almost invariably… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:29 pm
Back in September 2011, a claim by Rio Ferdinand arising out of the publication of an article about his communications with a former girlfriend ([2011] EWHC 2454 (QB)) was defeated in part by the public interest arising as a result of Mr Ferdinand’s “appointment as captain of England, first, on a temporary basis, in March 2008 and then in replacement of John Terry in February 2010” [87] This was, of course, the result of an earlier privacy case involving John… [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:29 am
Terry. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 2:27 pm
” United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 5:41 am
What is particularly striking is how this outcome appears to conflict with the cautionary tale that is the judgment in the injunction application of John Terry (LNS v Persons Unknown [2010] EWHC 119 (QB)) and in particular the references to the relationship. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 2:32 pm
After all, Terry v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:18 am
In this case (unlike the decision in Terry v Persons Unknown), the claimant denied the allegations of an extra-marital affair and further filed evidence that the Defendant was seeking to blackmail him. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 2:22 pm
Grissom v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
The `unknown’ query return was the only basis for the traffic stop. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 9:25 pm
J.L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000), in which uncorroborated information from an anonymous tip emanating from an “unknown caller” phoning from an “unknown location” was deemed insufficient to warrant a Terry stop). [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 12:47 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:00 am
In Terry v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:31 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York: Casillas v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:45 am
& Anor v Inerco Trade SA [2010] EWHC 162 (Comm) (08 February 2010) High Court (Patents Court) Research In Motion UK Ltd v Motorola Inc [2010] EWHC 118 (Pat) (03 February 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Ali v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 100 (QB) (27 January 2010) Terry v Persons Unknown (Rev 1) [2010] EWHC 119 (QB) (29 January 2010) Debt Collect London Ltd & Anor v SK Slavia Praha- Fotbal A S [2010] EWHC… [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 8:15 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:30 am
Of the various exceptions to the 4th Amendment’s warrant requirement, there’s probably none more frequently used, and certainly none more frequently litigated, than the “stop and frisk” doctrine created 42 years ago in Terry v. [read post]
