Search for: "Test Party 1"
Results 1 - 20
of 16,964
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 1:19 pm
APRA Sec. 13(a)(1). [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
[Slip op. at 1-2] At its heart, therefore, this case is a dispute about copyright ownership. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
” In this case, both parties agree that Mr. [read post]
13 May 2024, 2:59 am
Neither G 2/21 nor the subsequent decision by the referring Board of Appeal directly considered the question of contradictory evidence from opposing parties. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am
Both provisions mirror Articles 9(1) and (2)(a) of the EU Trade Secrets Directive (EU 2016/943). [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
The parties agree that the above alleged conduct is not shielded by immunity under Blassingame’s application of the Fitzgerald test (or any other version of the test for that matter). [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
West of counsel), for respondents.Fisher, J.(1) Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Robert J. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
West of counsel), for respondents.Fisher, J.(1) Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Robert J. [read post]
10 May 2024, 1:33 am
That application of the Duffield test to the organ is not the end of the matter because I cannot and should not ignore the fact that the instrument stands in its own right as a church treasure of considerable value both historically and musically (not to mention financially). [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:15 am
ArcSoft, Inc., No. 19-CV-05836-JSW, 2024 WL 1972891, at *1 (N.D. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
This launches his book’s righteous fight for our – at least us pleasure seeking cool kids -right to party. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
In considering whether to grant such applications, the Commissioner has historically applied the standard adopted by the Court of Appeals, which requires satisfaction of at least one of the following criteria: (1) that the parties are not capable of a full and adequate presentation and that the interested non-party could remedy this deficiency; (2) that the interested non-party could identify law or arguments that might otherwise escape consideration;… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
In considering whether to grant such applications, the Commissioner has historically applied the standard adopted by the Court of Appeals, which requires satisfaction of at least one of the following criteria: (1) that the parties are not capable of a full and adequate presentation and that the interested non-party could remedy this deficiency; (2) that the interested non-party could identify law or arguments that might otherwise escape consideration;… [read post]
8 May 2024, 11:21 am
Core Principle What it means and aims to promote 1 Accessibility Affordable; embraces user friendly interface and experience (UI/UX) methods. 2 Accountability Responsive to legal demands; zero-gap between application behavior and deployer’s liability; implementation has leadership approval; maps to Governance. 3 Accuracy Application performance aligns with marketing claims. 4 Consent Application functionality continuously maintains alignment with the end user’s consent; consent… [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:25 am
” FAR 3.101-1. [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:15 am
§ 9792.21.1(d)(1), other medical treatment guidelines such as the ACOEM and ODG at 8 Cal. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Kirkland opines that the use of standardized tests "disadvantages Black and Latinx students, who face culturally biased test language and tasks. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Kirkland opines that the use of standardized tests "disadvantages Black and Latinx students, who face culturally biased test language and tasks. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
Petitioners assert that the law fails the strict scrutiny test as it neither serves a compelling government interest nor is narrowly tailored. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
Plaintiffs assert that the law fails the strict scrutiny test as it neither serves a compelling government interest nor is narrowly tailored. [read post]
