Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 21 - 40
of 21,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2015, 6:51 am
As he was undergoing treatment, plaintiff requested an extended leave of absence, which would have put off his third testing attempt. [read post]
Nondisclosure of test results disclosed to testifying expert results in sanctions, but not dismissal
9 Apr 2009, 6:40 am
The test results were disclosed to the plaintiffs' expert witness, but never disclosed to the defendants. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 2:00 am
Under the risk-utility test, the court held that the plaintiff was required to present... [read post]
24 May 2021, 11:09 am
The plaintiff wins this appeal in a decision that can only be characterized as short and sweet. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 7:14 am
” And plaintiffs alleged that they didn’t. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 5:48 am
The plaintiffs decided to test-drive a car from the dealership. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
The court granted in part plaintiffs' motion for discovery sanctions and sanctioned defendant $1.5 million after defendant disclosed corrected stability dissolution testing data during a bench trial. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 3:29 pm
The second test is the risk-utility test. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 10:01 am
If and only if plaintiffs’ testing was FDA-compliant, then their claims were not preempted. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:15 am
The right test is "but for," as in, but for the employer's retaliatory motive, the plaintiff would not have been terminated. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 9:34 am
Further, they filed an application to compel the plaintiff to take a DNA test to prove his relationship with them. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 6:41 am
In the interests of finality, the plaintiff's application for a second test was properly denied. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:13 am
In that motion, 3M claimed that medical testing records recently produced by the Department of Defense show 90% of the earplug plaintiffs have no hearing loss. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 10:40 am
The Court of Chancery recently stated the appropriate test for a permanent injunction. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
DEFENDANTS WOULD OTHERWISE BE “DISADVANTAGED AND PREJUDICED”In a childhood lead-poisoning case, both sides retained independent psychologists to perform a neuropsychological examination, and when the Bronx County Supreme Court directed that the litigants exchange their experts’ “raw testing data” used to generate their respective reports, an appeal ensued.On its review of the dispute, the Appellate Division, First Department, noted that since the parties were… [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 4:43 pm
In general, the test for showing causation is the “but for” test. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 10:47 am
The fight over the scope of the “ABC test” for determining the status of workers under California state law continues unabated. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 10:47 am
The fight over the scope of the “ABC test” for determining the status of workers under California state law continues unabated. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 9:45 am
The defendant sought to compel the plaintiff to produce the three sample accused hard disk drives its expert tested. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:00 pm
The testing is performed by a licensed psychologist who administers numerous psychometric tests that assess a plaintiff’s ability to recall, recollect and process and information. [read post]
