Search for: "Texaco, Inc. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2012, 1:06 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 8:58 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Texaco Exploration & Prod., Inc., 844 F.Supp. 1156, 1160-63 (S.D.Tex.1994), and City of Jackson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:23 am by Louis M. Solomon
Though it is obvious that the Ecuadorian judicial system is different from that in the United States, those differences provide no basis for disregarding or disparaging that system. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 1:44 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
23 May 2007, 10:51 am
THE UNITED KINGDOM - 63176/00 [2007] ECHR 400 (22 May 2007) MCELROY AND OTHERS v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
Before turning to the new development, and for the purpose of putting things in the proper perspective, I would like to quote at some length from Texaco’s appellate brief in Aguinda v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:30 am by Howard Ullman
  The plaintiff developed and marketed a pharmaceutical product, and contracted with CoTherix to commercialize the product in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
Attorney’s Fees in a Copyright Action« Win One for the Gipper »  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20-CV-1157 Just as famous as some great upsets in sports history are the motivational speeches that inspired them. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:23 am
  It covers each of the fifty states of the United States, the District of Columbia, the 12 federal Circuit Courts of Appeal and the U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
Texaco, Inc., 46 Cal.3d 1147 (1988), and that such precedent should be used “with caution. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
Texaco, Inc., 46 Cal.3d 1147 (1988), and that such precedent should be used “with caution. [read post]