Search for: "Texas Employment Commission v. Hays"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
Thus, for example, charging a fee for a service (such as a set rate for feeding cattle, baling hay or harvesting crops) constitutes an “agricultural business” to which workers’ compensation applies.[8] Kansas caselaw shows that whether an activity is an agricultural activity is difficult to determine. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
AND ED GARZA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AGENT FOR WAL-MART; from Starr County;4th district (04-08-00146-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 07-01-09, pet. denied Oct 2009)(employment dispute, at will employment, no employment contract - no breach of contract, no agency, actual or apparent authority to enter contract for life-long employment, intentional infliction of emotional distress claim fails on appeal)09-0680 WILLIAM D. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:26 am
The case is Turner v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:06 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in 2004. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am
With its recent decision in Orca Communications Unlimited, LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
