Search for: "Texas v. Eastern Texas R. Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2017, 9:20 am
In Fourco Glass Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 11:02 am
v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:19 pm
(Ilya Somin) As co-blogger David Bernstein notes, Fisher v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 10:14 am
Specifically in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm
Howard II, John R. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
No. 01-17-00253-CVIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON, TEXAS LADANTA D. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 9:30 am
The case is entitled Kayser et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:25 pm
Univ. of Texas at AustinDocket: 11-345Date: June 24, 2013Read commentary & review related lower court decisions here.Justia Summary: Since the Court’s 2003 decision, Grutter v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 7:36 am
The case that may decide the fate of patent trolls in Eastern Texas has nothing to do with patent trolls or Eastern Texas. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 6:29 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (No. 9-06-cv-277RHC). [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 5:22 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 7:31 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas: U.S. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 6:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In the second, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 8:53 am
Co., 2014 U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
According to TrollTracker (click here for TrollTracker’s year end filing analysis), the Eastern District of Texas was first with 364 filings, more than 2.5 times the Northern District’s filings. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:46 pm
Microsoft's frustrations with the court in the Eastern District of Texas are clear based on the company's preliminary statements in its brief: In patent cases, even more than most, the trial judge's role as a gatekeeper is crucial. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 12:29 pm
” Pursuant to § 1391(c), a corporation is deemed to be a resident of “any judicial district in which such defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction…” In Fourco Glass Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 8:24 am
See Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. [read post]
