Search for: "Texas v. Environmental Protection Agency" Results 61 - 80 of 387
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  James Madison had suggested that constitutional protections of rights were, ultimately, only “parchment barriers” against the desires of those with political power, whether democratic majorities or oligarchs, to get their way. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:05 pm by bndmorris
Casto’s article “Dear Sister Antillico…”: The Story of Kirksey v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
In the past, shareholder activism has focused mostly on corporate-responsibility causes, such as environmental issues and pay equity between men and women as well as governance like executive pay. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm by Bryn Hines
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed a rule that would amend a program that requires industrial facilities to manage and prevent the release of hazardous chemicals into the air of surrounding communities. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:50 pm by Brent Wieand
Environmental Protection Agency This case follows a 2012 ruling by the justices that the Sacketts could bring civil action to challenge an EPA compliance order from the EPA. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Jim Dempsey
Environmental Protection Agency, but it may be unduly restrictive. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Republican Governors Gave Lucrative, No-Bid COVID-19 Deals to Utah Firms, Who Then Gave $1M to GOP Campaigns Yahoo News – Craig Harris, Bailey Schulz, and Katie Wedell (USA Today) | Published: 7/27/2022 A small number of companies leveraged their connections to sign deals to provide COVID-19 tests and personal protective equipment that would pay them at least $219 million in five GOP-led states. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Jillian Moss
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule to clarify and improve its greenhouse gas emissions compliance tool for heavy-duty vehicles. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Zoe Stern
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) does not have the power—absent an express authorization from Congress— to set emissions caps for power plants in a way that would drastically alter the U.S. energy system. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:25 am by Jonathan H. Adler
EPA, concerning the Environmental Protection Agency's authority to regulate greenhouse gases from power plants under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act, and Biden v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 10:04 am by John Elwood
Hardeman, 21-241Issues: (1) Whether the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act preempts a state-law failure-to-warn claim when the warning cannot be added to a product without the Environmental Protection Agency’s approval and the EPA has repeatedly concluded that the warning is not appropriate; and (2) whether the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 1:03 pm by Amy Howe
Environmental Protection Agency, the case of an Idaho couple who have been prohibited from building a home on land they own near Priest Lake, Idaho, because their lot contained wetlands that qualify as “navigable waters” regulated by the Clean Water Act. [read post]
15 May 2022, 9:11 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
February 4, 2021 | A Vision for a Federal Election Agency | Scholars advocate the creation of a new independent agency to oversee all federal election administration. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
Department of Justice better protect the safety of U.S. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:03 am by Scott Bomboy
Environmental Protection Agency The court must decide whether the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the statutory authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions as it considers cost, non-air impacts, and energy requirements, or if those EPA powers were limited by Congress under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Yet public opinion is not a singular phenomenon spread evenly across the country, and perhaps we shall see some significant discussion after the Court reverses Roe and eliminates affirmative action, not to mention the possibility of crippling the Environmental Protection Agency as an effective regulator of climate change. [read post]