Search for: "Texas v. Ross"
Results 101 - 120
of 324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
It should be noted that Texas made no effort to comply with the one person-one vote mandate of Baker v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:58 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Lyle has covered the controversy extensively for this blog; Ross Ramsey of the Texas Tribune, Michael Kirkland of UPI, and David G. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am
Ross Runkel previewed the case for this blog; Michael P. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:10 am
In The Washington Post, Nick Anderson notes that, although “Fisher v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:55 am
” Briefly: Adam Liptak reports in The New York Times on Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm
The Texas Supreme Court considered both of these questions this week in the case of Powell v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
ROSS Billy Ray Ross appeals from his conviction of failing to register as a sex offender, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 9:06 am
(Here is the latest edition of the Institute for Justice’s weekly Short Circuit newsletter, written by John Ross.) [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:58 am
It is from the Beaumont Court of Appeals and is styled, Murchison et al. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 12:30 pm
Dissent: The Supreme Court hasn't overruled Roe v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm
From Bush v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:35 am
Ross, BP v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:37 am
Ross,[12] and is being published before the case is decided. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:32 am
In Heffernan v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:57 am
The Texas Supreme Court recently provided pointed guidance to litigants seeking attorney’s fees in a fee-shifting setting. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 12:30 pm
House of Representatives needs 5%. Eleventh Circuit: The district court incorrectly short-circuited the Libertarian Party's First Amendment challenge by declining to apply the Anderson v. [read post]
