Search for: "Thacker v. Harris"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2019, 12:07 pm
In Manning v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:33 pm
Judge Thacker wrote a concurring opinion. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:35 am
Bureau of Land Management (Thacker Pass Lithium Mine Project; Tribal Intervention) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html People of the State of Michigan v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 4:33 pm
Note: A slow spell in the Ninth lets us flag an important – and time-sensitive – recent Compassionate Release case out of the Fourth Circuit].Players: Decision by Judge Harris, joined by Judges Diaz and Thacker. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 1:21 pm
Judge Wynn wrote a concurring opinion, joined by Judges Motz, Thacker, Harris, and Keenan. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
In a puzzling turn that EO-3’s challengers need to address at the Supreme Court, the INA argument only got five votes on the Fourth Circuit (Judges Gregory, Wynn, Harris, Diaz, and Thacker), while three generally liberal judges (Harris, Motz, and King) joined the majority on the constitutional issue but felt that the statutory issue was too complex to resolve. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
In a puzzling turn that EO-3’s challengers need to address at the Supreme Court, the INA argument only got five votes on the Fourth Circuit (Judges Gregory, Wynn, Harris, Diaz, and Thacker), while three generally liberal judges (Harris, Motz, and King) joined the majority on the constitutional issue but felt that the statutory issue was too complex to resolve. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
In a puzzling turn that EO-3’s challengers need to address at the Supreme Court, the INA argument only got five votes on the Fourth Circuit (Judges Gregory, Wynn, Harris, Diaz, and Thacker), while three generally liberal judges (Harris, Motz, and King) joined the majority on the constitutional issue but felt that the statutory issue was too complex to resolve. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:20 am
Trump, Chief Judge Gregory and Judges King, Wynn, Keenan, Motz, Thacker, Floyd, and Harris all voiced concerns about the revised EO’s legality under the Establishment Clause, while Judges Niemeyer and Shedd seemed to view the order as legal. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm
Claim of malicious prosecution for offense of blocking sidewalk could proceed; grant of summary judgment reversed Salley v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 9:08 am
Hudson v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:50 pm
Harris, Robert D. [read post]
