Search for: "The Active v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 18,115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The United States recognizes the extraterritorial application of many of its criminal statutes and frequently makes requests for fugitives whose criminal activity occurred in foreign countries with the intent, actual or implied, of affecting the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
PROTOCOL TO THE TREATY BETWEEN ROMANIA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS OVERVIEW The Protocol to the Treaty between Romania and the United States of America on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters (the ‘‘Protocol’’) serves to implement, as between the United States and Romania, the provisions of the 2003 Agreement on Mutual Legal Assistance between the United… [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:35 am by Judge Alan F. Pendleton (Retired)
Ogden would be used to justify the future expansion of congressional power to control not only commercial activity but a vast range of activities previously thought to be under the exclusive control of the states. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The United States recognizes the extraterritorial application of many of its criminal statutes and frequently makes requests for fugitives whose criminal activity occurred in foreign countries with the intent, actual or implied, of affecting the United States. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 2:42 pm by Josh Blackman
[This case really should be captioned United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:31 am by Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith
It provides (among other things) that a “foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case … in which the action is based upon a commercial activity carried on in the United States by the foreign state” (emphasis added). [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 8:56 am by Gene Takagi
On January 21, 2009, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United v. [read post]
Clearly, the government argued, Butina was in contact with Russian intelligence officials during her time in the United States. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This obviates the need to renegotiate or supplement the Treaty should both States pass laws covering new types of criminal activity, such as computer-related crimes. [read post]