Search for: "The Chinese Exclusion Case"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,454
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
Yet the exclusive reliance on such materials also drastically constrained the scope of research and provided a very skewed picture of Chinese law and society. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 12:37 pm
Bottom Line: Chinese companies love claiming something has to be done a particular way in China whether that is really the case is not. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:57 am
The Chinese manufacturer will only agree to provide exclusive rights to the foreign buyer in a case where the foreign buyer agrees to pay a price for that exclusivity. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:30 am
Some believe that the clause provides an absolute exclusion for damages caused by any sort of pollutant, including asbestos, lead, or fumes from Chinese drywall. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 12:43 am
As this case demonstrates, it is critically important for the standard pollution exclusion to be revised to carve back coverage for securities claims and derivative claims based on environmental disclosures. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:25 am
The District Court, following Deni Associates, noted that other courts in the Southern District of Florida have found allegations pertaining to the release of sulfur gases from defective Chinese drywall clearly within pollution exclusions virtually identical to the one in this case. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 4:48 am
If this is going to be the case, you should get credit for those sales against your monthly or annual sales requirement. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 4:48 am
If this is going to be the case, you should get credit for those sales against your monthly or annual sales requirement. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:08 am
Co., Case No. 09-17303, the Court determined that the home and its contents suffered a “direct physical loss” due to the presence of Chinese drywall; and policy exclusions for “wear and tear” and “errors, omissions, and defects” did not apply. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:02 pm
Therefore, the court denied summary judgment to the insurer as it “had not established a necessary predicate to its argument – as to which it bears the burden – that the pollution exclusion endorsement excludes coverage in this case. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:17 am
Articles 3 and 237 of the PRC’s Civil Procedure Law grant Chinese courts jurisdiction over international cases involving foreign plaintiffs against Chinese companies. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 8:10 am
Of course, fraud is by no means the exclusive province of Chinese companies. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 8:27 am
Third, Chinese courts base their rulings almost exclusively on documentary evidence, not testimony. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 6:05 am
If you suspect your home may be built with defective Chinese drywall, contact us here for a free no obligation case review. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 11:13 am
The case is Beijing Ciwen film and Television Production Co., Ltd., v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:03 pm
The pollution exclusion, which Judge Medley rejected based upon the Louisiana Supreme Court’s treatment of such clauses in cases like Doerr v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:31 am
Indeed, the Chinese Foreign Ministry offered no real legal justification for China’s actions except a cryptic reference to the incident taking place in “China’s traditional fishing grounds” and that the Chinese coast guard vessel did not enter “Indonesia’s territorial waters. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 5:00 am
Helfend has more than 30 years of experience exclusively in criminal defense. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Boyd School of Law, has posted Is the Chinese Exclusion Case Still Good Law? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 12:44 pm
The latest issue of the Chinese Journal of International Law (Vol. 9, no. 1, March 2010) is out. [read post]
