Search for: "The Collector v. Day" Results 161 - 180 of 450
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 1:52 pm by Harold O'Grady
Plaut reports on the tradition of Jewish volunteering, the Christmas mitzvah — something to do when the rest of the world has the day off. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Conceptually, this proposition violates logic because a loan is obviously not “made” when the borrower has already been in default for 180 days, which is the ordinary period of time before the account balance is charged off. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm by Zuri Blackmon
  IRS tax collectors abusing taxpayers A recent report from the U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1692e(1) by stating that the debtor could dispute the debt within 30 days of receipt, when the actual summons required the filing of an answer in court within 20 days. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1692e(1) by stating that the debtor could dispute the debt within 30 days of receipt, when the actual summons required the filing of an answer in court within 20 days. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am by SHG
Or is it just in case the cop needs to know who he can dump on if the day hasn’t gone particularly well? [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Legal Standard: ReconsiderationFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) provides, "[a] motion to alter or amend a judgment must be filed no later than 28 days after the entry of the judgment. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Legal Standard: ReconsiderationFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) provides, "[a] motion to alter or amend a judgment must be filed no later than 28 days after the entry of the judgment. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:14 am by Larry Tolchinsky
Chase Manhattan: Southern District of Florida In the case of  Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
For servicing purposes, a distinction is drawn between “delinquent status” (usually measured in days past-due or number of days in tiered bands) and “default” (after expiration of a finite number of days, such as 180, with no payments received in the interim). [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:37 am by Wolfgang Demino
Henry v Cash Biz LP et al Update Payday loan companies filed for bankruptcy on September 18, 2017 - 3 days after oral argument before the Texas Supreme Court in consumers' action against them. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 2:27 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Moreover, these collection attorneys would already be aware that they may incur FDCPA liability as third-party debt collectors for bringing a time-barred suit, so the practical effect of this component of the consent order may be limited because a deterrent is already in place in the form of private fair-debt collection actions against violators. [read post]