Search for: "The Confederate Note Case"
Results 21 - 40
of 787
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm
Indeed, it could do so in this very case! [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 12:14 pm
” In that case, Alito asked, how should the Supreme Court proceed? [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
The story of Floyd and his cabinet co-conspirators was the paradigm case that shaped Section 3. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
You will likely hear references to Griffin’s Case in the arguments. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
[Keisler and Bernstein contradicted Luttig's position.] [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
I don’t believe, however, that anyone in the case disputes that.) [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:54 am
(That is, unlike the real Section Three, it applied to all confederates and not just former office-holders, it applied to voting in federal elections instead of office-holding, and it had a sunset clause.) [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
Early reported state judicial cases holding former Confederate rebels disqualified from office did not require or suggest the need for prior criminal-law conviction. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court mishandles the pending case of Trump v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
Founding Both the 1777 Articles of Confederation and the U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Unfortunately, in this case the historical evidence does not support the argument. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
Anderson, the Section 3 case. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
The Berger Case Victor L. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Georgia even sent former Confederate Vice-President Alexander Stephens to the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:29 am
As noted in the brief and in this essay, these claims were made in passing, in speeches devoted to other matters. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:45 am
” One member of Congress noted during the Civil War that if a person knowingly sold a pair of shoes to a confederate soldier knowing those shoes would be used in battle, then the shoe salesperson was an insurrectionist for constitutional purposes. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 3:19 pm
[And it isn't a close case.] [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
The Articles of Confederation used the phrase "office . . . under the United States" in two provisions, but it did not use the phrase "Officers of the United States. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
This view is what we might call the Bernie Sanders/AOC theory of the case. [read post]
