Search for: "The Dear Rich Staff" Results 261 - 280 of 540
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2010, 12:47 pm
The Dear Rich Staff isn't very good at forecasting the future, but one thing we can predict with some certainty is that as soon as the NBA is aware of your nephew's sale of merchandise with the player's name and number, they'll get their lawyers to fire off a letter demanding that he halt the activity. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 6:25 am
 Actually, the answer doesn't vary from state to state (and in any case the Dear Rich Staff would never do you like that!) [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:10 am
Dear Rich: You show a lot of odd pictures of the Dear Rich Staff. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:44 pm
We don't know what language is included in your option agreement -- the Dear Rich Staff finds 'boilerplate' to be a deceptive term (with even more deceptive origins). [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:37 am
 A few months ago, the Dear Rich Staff modified (perhaps 'transformed' would be a better verb) a clip art image and used it at our blog. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:35 am
Dear Rich: I am equestrian artist that will be adding a t-shirt line to my portfolio. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:55 am
The Dear Rich Staff used to provide free legal advice at the CLA office in San Francisco but then we created this blog, instead! [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 5:32 am
Based on the high volume of Excel add-ons (or add-ins as they are more commonly known) the Dear Rich Staff feels that none of these issues will arise for you and you're probably going to have a problem-free release. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:42 pm
The Dear Rich Staff is always curious about people who send things to themselves as a form of legal maneuvering. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:44 am
(The Dear Rich Staff used to use them to find absentee landlords whose tenants had frontal lobe problems.) [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 7:04 am
" If you can prove that in court, you might be able to get off the hook for infringement, but the The Dear Rich Staff believes that the chances of proving an identical word mark on identical goods does not infringe is little bit like Dr. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
The Dear Rich Staff would like to help but we're pretty exhausted from reading all your questions. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:48 am
Of course, the Dear Rich Staff reminds you that to obtain that protection you must have used the marks prior to competitors. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:55 am
 The Dear Rich Staff reports that (1) no, permission is not needed for the link to the page and (2) yes, permission is needed for reproducing the photo (unless perhaps you are reproducing thumbnails, in which case it may be excused). [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 4:49 am
The Dear Rich Staff loves caricature art -- representations of people in an exaggerated fashion, usually for comic relief. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 5:04 am
Dear Rich: I have two trademarks registered to a corporation and will be transferring the rights to use these trademarks to a new corporation. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 9:31 am
Yes, yes, yes, and yes, although the Dear Rich Staff is a little concerned about the idea of "stuffing a family into a Chevy truck. [read post]