Search for: "The FW Group" Results 41 - 60 of 286
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2015, 1:26 pm by Sarah Wells
  An environmental group challenged this decision, alleging that the Service’s failure to consult violated section 7 of the ESA. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:43 pm by Collin R. Melancon and James Lapeze
  A group of private landowners (“the Landowners”), who owned all of Unit 1, brought a lawsuit in 2013 for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief against the FWS, its director, the United States Department of the Interior, and the Secretary of the Interior. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:43 pm by Collin R. Melancon and James E. Lapeze
  A group of private landowners (“the Landowners”), who owned all of Unit 1, brought a lawsuit in 2013 for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief against the FWS, its director, the United States Department of the Interior, and the Secretary of the Interior. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:43 pm by James E. Lapeze
  A group of private landowners (“the Landowners”), who owned all of Unit 1, brought a lawsuit in 2013 for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief against the FWS, its director, the United States Department of the Interior, and the Secretary of the Interior. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:57 am by Mike McBride
Without conversation grouping, or email threading, you might be able to sort by subject, but the software would not understand that “RE:” and “FW:” should be disregarded. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 11:48 am by Keith Rizzardi
FWS–R8–ES–2009–0072; 92210–1117–0000–B4 / RIN 1018–AW23 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised Critical Habitat for Santa Ana Sucker AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 4:56 pm by Keith Rizzardi
 However, this time, the sportsmen have the support of the state wildlife agencies and numerous conservation groups. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:52 pm by Keith Rizzardi
Other groups obviously agree; the status review is a byproduct of a settlement of a lawsuit filed by environmental groups who argued that the FWS improperly found listing of the species to be warranted but precluded by higher priorities, and who further argued that the decline in species abundance necessitated immediate emergency rulemaking. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 11:52 pm
 See also, Idaho Governor’s webpage, and FWS Q&A page RULING: The Court finds that the FWS’s decision to change course based on the new information, without submitting it for review and evaluation by any group of experts resulted in a decision that was not based on the best available science. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:36 pm by WIMS
      A number of industry groups, environmental organizations, and states challenged the Listing Rule as either overly restrictive or insufficiently protective of the polar bear. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:16 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Over the last four years, a few environmental groups have requested that more than 1,230 species be listed, compared with the previous 12 years in which annual requests averaged only 20 species.Some environmental groups argue that vastly expanded listings are needed as evidence mounts that the world is entering an era of mass extinctions related to destruction of habitat, climate and other changes. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:06 pm by Keith Rizzardi
FWS–R8–ES–2009–0073; MO 92210–0–0009 / RIN 1018–AW54 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Revised Critical Habitat for Brodiaea filifolia (Thread-Leaved Brodiaea) AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 3:58 am
District Court in Missoula granting a request by a coalition of twelve conservation groups for a preliminary injunction, which temporarily placed wolves back under federal protection. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:15 pm by Keith Rizzardi
 (After all, FWS also announced FWS five-year reviews of additional species in Oregon, California, and Hawaii.) [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 8:21 am by Keith Rizzardi
 In other bison-related litigation, environmental groups recently suffered a significant setback when the Court rejected their attempts to “stop the slaughter” of brucellosis-infected bison herds. [read post]