Search for: "The Fair, Petitioner, v. Federal Trade Commission, Respondent"
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
To the extent that the attorney general's brief addressed the point on changes in health insurance for judges, it did so because the petitioner judges addressed that cause of action against all respondents, including the Legislature and the governor. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
The Justices awarded relist gold to the petitioner in Hinton v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
Cedar Fair, L.P. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
TexasIssue: (1) Whether a state habeas petitioner who raises a freestanding actual-innocence claim under the Due Process Clause, and who demonstrates actual innocence by at least a preponderance of the evidence, must instead make that showing by clear and convincing evidence to warrant a new trial; and (2) whether, in light of trial counsel’s errors, petitioner received ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of Strickland v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Fish & Game Commission (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105; Health First v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Fish & Game Commission (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105; Health First v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Fish & Game Commission (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105; Health First v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
In June 2009, the Federal Trade Commission commenced a civil action against, among others, the defendant, in connection with the operation of his Internet company. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
In June 2009, the Federal Trade Commission commenced a civil action against, among others, the defendant, in connection with the operation of his Internet company. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Both sides have the opportunity to argue to the Solicitor General to explain why it is in the best interest of the United States either to have review be granted (the petitioner, the side seeking Supreme Court review) or denied (the respondent, who is opposing review). [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm
A. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
In Hurley v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor)… [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
The petitioner Robert Bropho had appealed to the Federal Court of Australia on the grounds that the primary judge had erred in law in finding that although the cartoon “A [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
GRIMSLEY, Appellant, v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
ARTHUR JAMES CONLAN, Appellee. 4th District.Evidence -- Hearsay -- For purposes of statute requiring commission to investigate certain election law violations after having received sworn complaint or information reported to commission by Division of Elections and further providing that sworn complaint must be based upon personal information or information other than hearsay, administrative law judge properly interpreted “hearsay” according to its common usage, rather… [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Supreme Court decision in Stern v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
” The respondent: “Guilty. [read post]
