Search for: "The Franklin Company v. the United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
Thornton, supra) (emphasis added). [8] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 4:56 pm
[3] United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(Class 46) United Kingdom EWCA: Unlicensed imprecision: Pink Floyd v EMI Records (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Just sue them! [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:38 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:43 am
Langdell was a United States resident and the first and second defendant companies were incorporated in the United States. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
After saying that Congress has taxing power, the provision does say — without elaboration – that Congress also has the power “to provide for….the general welfare of the United States.” Congress customarily does not just hand out money to the states without strings attached. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:21 am
In 2006, the Florida Legislature enacted several statutes in response to the United States Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 9:07 pm
Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:45 am
So in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am
Preska, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, rule [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 2:31 pm
")But I think that we are going to see many more German copyrights exploited in the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
Doyal, a company that licensed films challenged the collection of state taxes on the gross receipts of royalties from its licenses.8 The company argued that its copyrights were “instrumentalities” of the federal government and, thus, immune from state taxation. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
Doyal, a company that licensed films challenged the collection of state taxes on the gross receipts of royalties from its licenses.8 The company argued that its copyrights were “instrumentalities” of the federal government and, thus, immune from state taxation. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 1:09 pm
SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm
Companies use real-time biddi [read post]
