Search for: "The Java" Results 101 - 120 of 1,496
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2021, 11:05 am by Jo Dale Carothers
At the time Google was developing the Android platform, many software developers were using Sun Microsystems’ Java programming language and its popular Java SE platform. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 6:38 am by Rick Mescher
Permitting the copying of the Java API clearly reduces market value of the Java code for Oracle. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 1:13 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Google LLC v Oracle America Inc. concerned the Java SE program, which uses Oracle's Java programming language. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 1:13 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Google LLC v Oracle America Inc. concerned the Java SE program, which uses Oracle's Java programming language. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 1:13 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Google LLC v Oracle America Inc. concerned the Java SE program, which uses Oracle's Java programming language. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 1:13 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Google LLC v Oracle America Inc. concerned the Java SE program, which uses Oracle's Java programming language. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:15 am by IPWatchdog
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Federal Circuit finds that Apple’s patent licensing agreement with Qualcomm eliminated standing to appeal IPRs from the PTAB; the Second Circuit hears oral arguments in copyright lawyer Richard Liebowitz’s sanctions appeal as well as an appeal of antitrust claims against Takeda over improper extensions of FDA exclusivity for Actos; the Supreme Court rules that Google’s copying of Oracle’s Java API was fair use; Brazil’s… [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:15 am by IPWatchdog
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Federal Circuit finds that Apple’s patent licensing agreement with Qualcomm eliminated standing to appeal IPRs from the PTAB; the Second Circuit hears oral arguments in copyright lawyer Richard Liebowitz’s sanctions appeal as well as an appeal of antitrust claims against Takeda over improper extensions of FDA exclusivity for Actos; the Supreme Court rules that Google’s copying of Oracle’s Java API was fair use; Brazil’s… [read post]
 Google designed it this way, believing that Java application programmers would want to find the same 37 sets of functionalities in the new Android system callable by the same names as used in Java. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:55 am by Eugene Volokh
Also, relevant to the "mixed question of law and fact" issue, the majority says: "the jury's fair use determination means that neither Sun's effort to obtain a license [so in the Court's opinion, but likely refers to Google's effort to obtain a license -EV] nor Oracle's conflicting evidence can overcome evidence indicating that, at a minimum, it would have been difficult for Sun to enter the smartphone market, even had Google not used portions of the… [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 1:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Also, relevant to the “mixed question of law and fact” issue, the majority says: “the jury’s fair use determination means that neither Sun’s effort to obtain a license nor Oracle’s conflicting evidence can overcome evidence indicating that, at a minimum, it would have been difficult for Sun to enter the smartphone market, even had Google not used portions of the Sun Java API. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 9:40 am by Brandon W. Clark
The Java API had been developed by Sun Microsystems, which Oracle purchased in 2010. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:34 pm by Michael Risch
It should only determine that the scope of its copyright in the Java source code cannot extend to infringement through the reuse of declaring functions necessary to create a compiler or interpreter that accepts the same commands and parameter names to allow programmers to use the Java programming language. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:33 pm by Tom Smith
The Court ruled that Google did not violate copyright law when it included parts of Oracle’s Java programming code in its Android operating system—ending a decade-long multibillion dollar legal battle. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 11:38 am by Howard Bashman
“Supreme Court Backs Google in Copyright Fight With Oracle; The 6-to-2 ruling ended a decade-long battle over whether Google had improperly used Java code in its Android operating system”: Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 11:29 am by Jonathan Bailey
It quickly set about work developing the operating system and, as part of it, wanted to include Java libraries so Java applications could run in Android. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 11:09 am by Ronald Mann
When Google designed Android, it wanted to make it readily accessible to developers familiar with the Java programming language, so it included in the Android operating system about 11,500 lines of code from Java SE, a platform that allows developers to write programs in Java that can run on various devices. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 10:45 am by Editor Charlie
Oracle case, in which the Court ruled 6–2 that Google’s copying of Oracle’s Java code was permissible under the fair use doctrine, Copyright Alliance CEO Keith Kupferschmid stated the following:  “Yesterday’s Supreme Court ruling in favor of Google in the decade long Google v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:45 am by Timothy B. Lee
For the previous decade, Google had been arguing in lower courts that it didn't infringe copyright law when it re-implemented Java for use in Android. [read post]