Search for: "The Justices v. Murray"
Results 421 - 440
of 749
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
EU quietly asks Canada to rework trade deal's thorny investment clause https://t.co/bgBmR51w1F -> Why the TPP is an opportunity for the creation of an APAC safe harbour for cross-border transfers of personal data https://t.co/JbjBapTfCZ -> Setting the record straight on TPP and Treaty https://t.co/La6D9GXkgr -> Case Law, New Zealand: Wishart v Murray, Social media libel, Justice Courtney’s Christmas gift for practitioners https://t.co/Ktwc3tpWbT ->… [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
See Washington v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
See Washington v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm
In terms of precedent, her Honour referred chiefly to Leigh v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 624, [2011] 2 NZLR 148, Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 and Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm
Murray, 53 Misc. 364, 104 N.Y.S. 740; Goldman v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm
Next week, the 110th AALS Annual Meeting starts in New York. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Saywell Colonial Justice: Justice, Morality and Crime in the Niagara District, 1791-1849 by David Murray Canadian State Trials Volume Two: Rebellion and Invasion in the Canadas, 1837-8 edited by F. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:19 am
Andrew Murray is Professor of Law at London School of Economics. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:22 pm
In today’s case (Easton v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am
Back in 2004, Californian state senator Kevin Murray wrote this in a report in US recording industry practices:“Much like the public generally dislikes politicians, but love their individual representatives, Artists have respect for their record company handlers, but distrust the companies themselves and the system they operate under. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 8:14 am
Murray, Sr.Alexander Spicola BokorPaul AielloGina BeovidesBarbara T. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
Nicolas Murray v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 5:01 am
In Atkins v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
In the Court of Appeal, the court considered the development of the case law, especially the recent cases of Murray v Leisureplay Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 and El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539, stating (per Lord Justice Moore-Bick at paragraph 21): “[T]he modern cases thus appear to accept that a clause providing for payment on a breach of a sum of money that exceeds the amount that a court would award as compensation…may… [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:31 pm
See, Murray Energy v. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 7:06 am
Texas Department of Housing v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
Supp. 2d at 1210 (echoing Chief Justice Durham’s analysis). [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 4:05 pm
Haskell Murray writes: In this interview, Delaware Supreme Court Chief Justice Leo Strine singles out C & J Energy Services, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm
Forum shoppers take heed: New Zealand’s doors of justice are open for business! [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:56 am
In the case of Murray v Leisureplay plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963, the Court of Appeal adopted the wider approach of ascertaining what the predominant function of the clause was. [read post]
