Search for: "The Justices v. Murray"
Results 541 - 560
of 749
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2012, 11:54 am
" Caption: Schron et al. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 9:57 pm
Murray on indictment #5174/94 could not change it from consecutive to concurrent. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 4:28 pm
Murray. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
Resolved complaints since our last round up include: [Week commencing 20 August]: Mr Wayne Jenkins v The Sunday Times, Clause 1, 24/08/2012; Mr Adam Wood v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Frank Kane v Newtownards Chronicle, Clause 3, 23/08/2012; Mr Serge Voronov v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Linda Sutherland… [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 3:44 am
’ That definition has been expanded and applied by the English Court of Appeal in Murray v Express Newspapers in 2008 and by Mr Justice Tugendhat in the LNS/John Terry case in 2010: ‘The question whether there is a reasonable expectation of privacy is a broad one, which takes account of all the circumstances of the case. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm
Here is a link to United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:15 am
Analysis Football DataCo v Yahoo! [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 4:20 am
Murray and Joel P. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:36 am
v Croatia – Reported on Mental Health and Mental Capacity Law Blog Failure to protect against disability related harassment violates Article 3 AA v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2012] EWHC 2103 (QB)Publication of photograph of child said to be fathered by celebrity breached privacy rights. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm
Comedian Al Murray describes the case as “an absurdist operetta”. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 3:22 am
– Ed) Tods Murray’s Lexcel award comes amid a crop of other similar lapel pins & certificates handed out to solicitors recently, as part of a somewhat obvious desperate attempt by both Scottish & English industry regulators to drum up business for ailing law firms which have become infamous for battles with their clients such as the Tods Murray v Arakin where pensioner Mr McNamara has been appealing a ruling by law firm favourite judge Lord Woolman he… [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:38 pm
” On combines (R. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:55 am
While court users in England & Wales have been able to call upon the services of McKenzie Friends, Scotland took FORTY YEARS to allow McKenzie Friends to appear in the Court of Session, many contend due to resistance from the legal profession & worries clients may chose to litigate themselves instead of hiring expensive legal teams.An earlier report on the Tods Murray v Arakin case can be read HERE with coverage of the appeal, recently heard by the court HERE and more on… [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:27 am
Claire Murray of University College Cork. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am
Speaking on the fall-out from Damache the Minister for Justice, Alan Shatter T.D. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 11:39 am
" An earlier report on the case can be read HERE and more on the history of Arakin Ltd’s dispute with Tods Murray can be found at a website on the case, here : Tods Murray v Arakin [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
On Wednesday 27 June 2012, a three judge Divisional Court, the Lord Chief Justice, Owen and Griffiths Williams JJ heard the “Twitter joke” case, Chambers v DPP. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am
Please forgive the detail but we fear some of those who decide these matters will not be aware of the real practical facts that may seem trivial but we, as practitioners, know make a real difference to the quality of justice. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:32 am
The case of Tods Murray v Arakin and Mr McNamara’s position as a “Vexatious Litigant” featured in the Sunday Herald : A-courting we will go ... [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:11 am
The case is Schron et al v. [read post]
