Search for: "The MOVIE 1 & 2 v. United Artists Communications, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am
As of January 31, 2020, Cox Communications has filed an appeal asking for either 1. a remittitur (lowering of damages), or 2. a new trial. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am
As of January 31, 2020, Cox Communications has filed an appeal asking for either 1. a remittitur (lowering of damages), or 2. a new trial. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am
As of January 31, 2020, Cox Communications has filed an appeal asking for either 1. a remittitur (lowering of damages), or 2. a new trial. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am
As of January 31, 2020, Cox Communications has filed an appeal asking for either 1. a remittitur (lowering of damages), or 2. a new trial. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:43 am
The empirical research, which looked at the effects in various countries including the United States, suggests that these anti-piracy measures are not as effective as the movie studios had hoped. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:16 pm
United Artists Television, Inc., the Court found that a CATV provider did not infringe a copyright holders’ exclusive right to perform their works publicly because the CATV provider did not “perform” at all. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 9:54 am
Circuit Court of Appeals, Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:59 pm
Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., 551 U.S. 449 (2007), the U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:31 am
Thomas (not exact without all the official "inc. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:33 am
Allvoices, Inc., No. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Helmsley-Spear, Inc. 4 Vill. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
§ 1125(a)(1)(A) of the federal trademark law (commonly known as the Lanham Act) if this unauthorized use of that mark (1) is artistically relevant to the underlying work, and (2) does not explicitly mislead regarding the source or content of the work. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:46 am
United Artists Television, 392 U.S. 390, (1968);Teleprompter v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
Elsewhere, the Court of Justice of the European Union has defined, re-defined and refined its own and (perhaps) our understanding of what the right of 'communication to the public' under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive actually is. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:59 pm
Discovery Communications, Inc., 101 P.3d 552, 562 (Cal. 2004), and Shulman v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
WMG proposed a two-part compromise to artists with record deals that pre-date 2002. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:57 am
Apple Inc. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 4:59 am
Photo by ACME Newspictures, Inc. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
