Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Adkins" Results 41 - 60 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2012, 5:11 pm
The Florida State Supreme Court, on July 12, 2012, in a 5-2 ruling, in State v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:21 am by Guest Blogger
It was the same freedom of contract that the Court in Adkins v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:03 pm
The University of West Virginia Board of Trustees, 438 S.E. 2d 590 (W.Va. 1993), and Adkins v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
" Because of this, the plaintiff's claim, and future plaintiff's claims, are not subject to any rigorous legal standard other than a jury's opinion.Judge Adkins noted that claimants and the businesses they sue will "have virtually no standard for differentiating acceptable and unacceptable conduct in terms of dealing with people's differences in health status. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:05 am by cheynovi
Sinbad: Comedian and actor Sinbad Adkins allegedly owes $2.1 million tothe stateof California, and another $400,000 to the IRS. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm by Michelle Yeary
Fla. 2003) (sales rep and pharmaceutical manufacturer have no duty to control doctor’s prescribing practices)).While we have dipped our toe into this pond in the past (see prior post Riegel Toothpaste (Adkins v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]