Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Anderson" Results 381 - 400 of 900
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2009, 8:08 pm
"Right now, two or three people are making decisions that affect the entire state," said Anderson, who is an attorney. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
Meanwhile, Mark Anderson, the doyen of IP transactional bloggers, expresses in IP Draughts his own perplexity at the increasingly execrated ruling of the US Supreme Court on post-expiry royalty payments in Kimble v  Marvel. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni discusses Dassey v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
For instance, even if a phone company learned that an answering machine had a libelous outgoing message (see Anderson v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:59 pm by Kevin
Looks like we have a new record for Largest Known Demand: Anton Purisma v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 3:15 pm
A federal appeals court in San Francisco ruled on May 15 in Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 5:38 am
This Kat congratulates and personally expresses his gratitude to Michael Edenborough QC (Serle Court), Shireen Smith (Azrights) and Mark Anderson (Anderson Law LLP) for the tremendous support they have given Gus and Inez. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Brown, Alex Engler, and Henry Claypool to discuss how people with disabilities are impacted by current technology and legislation on this issue: Loren DeJonge Schulman discussed Schedule F, a Trump administration federal workforce policy, and its potential implications on national security. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 11:44 am by Benjamin Pollard
Anderson sat down with Derek Muller to discuss the independent state legislature doctrine in light of the pending Supreme Court case Moore v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:10 pm
"The Strange World of IP Consents", launched on Friday afternoon as the fourth item down in the IPKat's Friday Fantasies feature, already has over 50 people registered. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
  Likewise, although Graham announced that the subpoenas are necessary because "[t]he American people deserve answers to these questions" about "why all these counterintelligence investigations were opened to begin with" and "how these investigations got off the rails," a recent Office of Legal Counsel opinion insists that "transmitting information “to inform the public . . . is not a part of the legislative function. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:13 am
 To date, however, only three people (bless them) have taken the trouble to contact the IPO, two of these being from outside the UK. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:25 am
 The ever-cultured Mark Anderson, of IP Draughts fame, has been attending the Edinburgh Festival of late. [read post]