Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Bailey"
Results 1 - 20
of 317
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 9:40 am
Emanuela discussed very hot topics, including the cases Hermès Int’l v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
The trial was recently the center of TV series “The People v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
(Chy Lung v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 9:43 am
From P.S. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Bailey, Show the Brief: Visual Writing Strategies & Techniques (2022). 70. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).Edward A. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Dagenhart, the Court struck down a federal child labor law and in 1922 in Bailey v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Ct. 1731, 1755 (2020) (Alito, J., dissenting) (statutory words “mean what they conveyed to reasonable people at the time they were written” (citation omitted)); Kisor v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 2:57 am
Case-notes DLA Piper has just published a series of notes on leading cases on religion/belief and employment law: Bailey v Stonewall Equality Ltd and Garden Court Chambers (2020) Fahmy v Arts Council England (2023) Furlong v The Chief Constable of Cheshire Police (2019) Grainger Plc and others v Nicholson (2010) Higgs v Farmor’s School (2023) Joanna Phoenix v Open University (2024) Ladele v London Borough of Islington… [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm
McLaughlin v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 1:21 pm
AAER sued Perkins Cole over the fellowship program’s requirement that applicants be “members of a group historically underrepresented in the legal profession,” including people of color and LGBTQ+ people. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 5:52 am
Denezpi v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 2:32 pm
(See Bailey v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 8:56 am
In Biden v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 11:02 am
Anna Fitz-James v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Yesterday's closing argument in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 5:23 pm
Our clients are “people” and not “cases” or “files. [read post]
