Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Carr"
Results 1 - 20
of 257
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
People have a right to publicly say "Putin, keep up the good fight against Ukraine" (or, in an earlier era, "Sandinistas, keep up the good fight against the contras") even though that would be aimed at defeating U.S. policy. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 10:51 am
From yesterday's Ohio Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm
Carr and Reynolds v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
NetChoice v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm
The second factor that Carr and Simington identify is “the degree to which the regulated entity makes individualized decisions about the speech it carries—as opposed to operating in the main as a conduit for other peoples’ speech. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
NetChoice claims that it has an unbridled right to censor or otherwise discriminate against other peoples’ speech. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm
Or, as dissenting FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr observed, “the internet didn’t break. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 2:01 pm
Let's Start With Some Semantics My friend and colleague Jeffrey Carr is married to a wonderful Belarusian-turned-freedom-loving American named Tanya. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 11:58 pm
All the Chaplains are available to provide pastoral care to people regardless of their faith or belief. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
The new legal term begins with the swearing in of the new head of the judiciary, the Lady Chief Justice, Lady Carr. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 12:41 pm
The case of Tyler v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
Lady Justice Carr admitted the sentences were severe, but added “we have concluded that they were not manifestly excessive; nor did they amount to a disproportionate interference with their rights of freedom of expression and assembly. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 1:20 pm
Carr. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:18 pm
Right, I am back from a two week holiday (it was lovely thank you) so onwards… Crescent Trustees Limited v Behjat. [read post]
23 May 2023, 6:10 am
See Marrone v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On 18 May 2023 there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Carr v Carr. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
Attending Capita’s AGM, the campaigners called on the company’s Managing Director for Electronic Monitoring to watch and respond to recorded testimonies of people fitted by the surveillance devices. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 12:41 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:14 pm
Published Decisions R v. [read post]
