Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Connolly"
Results 41 - 60
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:01 am
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 1:25 pm
It would take most people 100 years to build a career like that, but Younger did it in 30. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
It had to lay off at least 650 people and shut down production at three plants. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:17 am
From Blankenship v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:37 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
Like Jon Connolly and Liz Thornberry, I am tracing law and legalities in a British imperial setting. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
As of now, the 1969 Supreme Court decision of Tinker v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:30 am
Q: Tell us about the Vilsmeyer v. 3M trial. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court recently declined to grant review in the very interesting case of Saint John’s Church in the Wilderness v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:27 am
Connolly, 281 Va. 553, 559 (2011)). [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 4:05 pm
Supreme Court had broached in the 1910 case of Weems v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 7:04 am
Oakley, John V. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
In addition, the hearing will explore the authorities available to the Administration and the international community to protect the people of Hong Kong, Uyghurs, Kazakhs, and others. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 11:12 pm
Murder v. subsidence? [read post]
6 May 2009, 3:01 pm
In more detail, the Medical Device Safety Act (S. 540/H.R. 1346) would address the Supreme Court's Riegel v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 5:43 am
From Hamor v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
Whether domain expertise can safeguard against hindsight bias is not entirely clear, experts – specifically judges – are certainly not immune to hindsight bias.[3]Deliberation in groups does not seem to reliably reduce hindsight bias, but the research is limited and restricted to small groups (three people). [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 4:28 pm
The case, Kennedy v. [read post]
