Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Lang"
Results 101 - 120
of 248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2008, 2:32 pm
People v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:03 am
Supreme Court will decide Young v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:47 am
People v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
This text may seem a little puzzling to people who don't walk the streets of London, but there was some rhyme and reason: it was in response to a very striking advertisement by gay rights campaign organisation Stonewall, which read: "SOME PEOPLE ARE GAY, GET OVER IT!" [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
., v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 5:55 pm
Lawdiva aka Georgialee Lang [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 12:13 am
People v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:45 am
[i] They recommend that people take “precautions”. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 7:20 am
Lawdiva aka Georgialee Lang [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:06 pm
In Katz v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:02 am
We are pleased to welcome the latest post in our series of responses to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in A, B & C v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm
Greg Lang v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
Following the 2012 presidential election (as in every election), quite a few people loudly declaimed that they would move to Canada if their candidate lost. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:09 am
Frankfurt am Main ; New York : Peter Lang, 2010 311 p. ; 22 cm. [read post]
China Patent: SPC IP Tribunal holds first joint hearing on patent validity and infringement disputes
24 Dec 2019, 5:49 am
The unique facts of the Power Electronics v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 2:13 pm
Judge McCree presided over People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 2:13 pm
Judge McCree presided over People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 4:13 am
Rajesh Bansal and Koninklijke Philips v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm
First, Dr Rolph identifies problems in the Lange (Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520) defence, noting it was not followed in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Pty Ltd [2001] 2 AC 227, a decision which the Australian courts have in turn refused to recognise, and which the High Court of Australia has declined opportunities to consider ever since, despite hinting at it in 2002: Skalkos v Assaf [2002] HCA Trans 649 (13 December 2002). [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:02 am
In practice, it makes sense to engage with experts early and to ascertain what people in the relevant scientific community were thinking and doing or not doing around the priority date of the patent under consideration. [read post]
